Beautiful bride
Handsome groom
Passion for God
Love for each other
Handsome groom
Passion for God
Love for each other
Congratulations to my sister and brother-in-law Justine and Justin! =)
May 23, 2008
Apr 29, 2008
A Godly Legacy
Last weekend, a friend of my sister's named Dan passed away in an accident. I didn't really know him, but I would like to tell you of the legacy I know that he left with the people who did, and those who knew of him. He was only 22 when the Lord took him home, but even at that seemingly young age, he had had an impact on the world around him. He was on fire for God and had an immense passion for bringing the lost to Christ, and for living for Christ. When people thought of what Dan was all about, that's what they thought of - his love and excitement for his God.
Although Dan's life was, by man's standard short, he used it to its to fullest. No time wasted. It rightly convicted my heart to contemplate as to how people would define what I lived for if I should die right now. Sadly, I don't think it would be my love for God. It also struck me to realize that Dan didn't waste his college years - he used them for God's glory. Speaking for myself, I may be tempted to use my college years for my selfish ends with God as a sideline - thinking that I'd "get serious" about God later. But the fact is, that there won't always be a "later". I am quite sure that none of this is a foreign concept to any of you but for me it was a sobering reality check into how God intends for His children to live - and how far I am from it.
Hence, I have written this post as a tribute to Dan, but more importantly, a tribute to how our gracious and mighty God used him in the time that he had.
Although Dan's life was, by man's standard short, he used it to its to fullest. No time wasted. It rightly convicted my heart to contemplate as to how people would define what I lived for if I should die right now. Sadly, I don't think it would be my love for God. It also struck me to realize that Dan didn't waste his college years - he used them for God's glory. Speaking for myself, I may be tempted to use my college years for my selfish ends with God as a sideline - thinking that I'd "get serious" about God later. But the fact is, that there won't always be a "later". I am quite sure that none of this is a foreign concept to any of you but for me it was a sobering reality check into how God intends for His children to live - and how far I am from it.
Hence, I have written this post as a tribute to Dan, but more importantly, a tribute to how our gracious and mighty God used him in the time that he had.
Apr 4, 2008
Feb 27, 2008
True Love
With a couple of siblings getting married soon, the topic of 'love' has been on my mind. What exactly is love? It seems so intangible at times...something that I may not be able to recognize. Movie writers in Hollywood would like us to believe that love is a feeling, is an attraction, an "oh he's cute", or "she's fun". They would like to believe that love is soft fuzzy feeling, or a passionate emotion. But the folly in that belief lies in the fact that love is not singularly a feeling. As one Bible teacher put it - love is a verb. True love is an ardent desire to do; to please, and serve another person. It is not - as it is commonly portrayed - an ardent desire to get, or be satisfied by another. Is this not God's love for us? What can we possibly offer God that He should love us? What could He possibly gain? No, His love for us was in no way for His gain, save for His glory. Our love for each other - whether it be a spouse, sibling, parent, or friend - should be saturated with a desire to serve, not be served. A desire to show kindness, a passion to make another happy.
I must clarify, that love involves a feeling too. The feelings that come with love are a gifts from God and should in no way be discredited. But the trouble comes when all someone bases 'love' on are those feelings in themselves, because when a marriage or a friendship hits a tuff spot, feelings won't last all that long. However, love that is based on what you can give, not on what you can get will last until there is no one to give to because your not in it for anything else. I know that may sound a little bit like 'fuzzy land' and I know that I am so far removed from being able to love to that extent in my own sinfulness, but I think that is what love really is. And I hope someday with God's enabling grace, to love to this extent in all my relationships with others.
I must clarify, that love involves a feeling too. The feelings that come with love are a gifts from God and should in no way be discredited. But the trouble comes when all someone bases 'love' on are those feelings in themselves, because when a marriage or a friendship hits a tuff spot, feelings won't last all that long. However, love that is based on what you can give, not on what you can get will last until there is no one to give to because your not in it for anything else. I know that may sound a little bit like 'fuzzy land' and I know that I am so far removed from being able to love to that extent in my own sinfulness, but I think that is what love really is. And I hope someday with God's enabling grace, to love to this extent in all my relationships with others.
Feb 13, 2008
Dec 28, 2007
A new look at Christians in Government
Titus 5:1-21 Remind them to be subject to rulers and authorities, to obey, to be ready for every good work, 2 to speak evil of no one, to be peaceable, gentle, showing all humility to all men.
In a recent series on Titus by our pastor, he touched briefly on the subject of Christians in government. Making a convincing connection between verse 1 and 2 of the text above – that being that verse two is how we are to be subject to rulers and authorities. Rulers in government, and rulers on a person to person level. This excerpt is the part on Christians in government. The full audio version of the sermon is available at http://www.gbcmt.org/sermons.php?series=Titus under the sermon heading of ‘Living Worthy of the Gospel’. It’s a great series if you’re looking for something to download onto your i-pod. =)
“In our system of government, guard your words of how you speak of leaders no matter how vile or wicked....Instead of being a fighter, insubordinate, and argumentative, we should be known as those who are peaceable, humble, and gentle. This answers the question that many Christians have in their role in government. Is it okay to object, is it okay to try to change things? After all we are in a democratic system or form government, is it okay? Yes if. If our character is peaceable gentle and humble. This is what God calls us to be. Unfortunately, far too many… high-profile Christians are known as being those who are argumentative, those who are sarcastic, those who are rebellious, those who are insubordinate. And their character is not known to be gentle, peaceable, and humble. This is what God wants us to reflect. And if we do so using the system it’s fine. When we step outside of that to where our character is violating these principles or this kind of character that God calls upon us, it is unacceptable. And this is true in our relationship with government as well as on a person to person level…think about it, we never get anywhere eternally by arguing and fighting with non-Christians. It doesn’t accomplish anything; it just arouses hostility in them. That’s why in verse two, God says we should be peaceable gentle, and humble. If we have to disagree, if we have to change something, we can do so: peaceably, gently, and humbly. Those are the kind of virtues that will impact people in a corrupt society.”
Unfortunately, the truth is many Christians in government, and even Christians merely interested in politics - myself included - can easily fall into the ditch with the rest of the political world and be mean and sarcastic in ways that are never to characterize a Christian. It's easy to excuse it when taking about or to a person with clearly wrong views, or a truly irking political personality. But as our goal in life as Christians is to win people to Christ, not to conservatism, God calls us to a higher level of conduct in the political realm.
In a recent series on Titus by our pastor, he touched briefly on the subject of Christians in government. Making a convincing connection between verse 1 and 2 of the text above – that being that verse two is how we are to be subject to rulers and authorities. Rulers in government, and rulers on a person to person level. This excerpt is the part on Christians in government. The full audio version of the sermon is available at http://www.gbcmt.org/sermons.php?series=Titus under the sermon heading of ‘Living Worthy of the Gospel’. It’s a great series if you’re looking for something to download onto your i-pod. =)
“In our system of government, guard your words of how you speak of leaders no matter how vile or wicked....Instead of being a fighter, insubordinate, and argumentative, we should be known as those who are peaceable, humble, and gentle. This answers the question that many Christians have in their role in government. Is it okay to object, is it okay to try to change things? After all we are in a democratic system or form government, is it okay? Yes if. If our character is peaceable gentle and humble. This is what God calls us to be. Unfortunately, far too many… high-profile Christians are known as being those who are argumentative, those who are sarcastic, those who are rebellious, those who are insubordinate. And their character is not known to be gentle, peaceable, and humble. This is what God wants us to reflect. And if we do so using the system it’s fine. When we step outside of that to where our character is violating these principles or this kind of character that God calls upon us, it is unacceptable. And this is true in our relationship with government as well as on a person to person level…think about it, we never get anywhere eternally by arguing and fighting with non-Christians. It doesn’t accomplish anything; it just arouses hostility in them. That’s why in verse two, God says we should be peaceable gentle, and humble. If we have to disagree, if we have to change something, we can do so: peaceably, gently, and humbly. Those are the kind of virtues that will impact people in a corrupt society.”
Unfortunately, the truth is many Christians in government, and even Christians merely interested in politics - myself included - can easily fall into the ditch with the rest of the political world and be mean and sarcastic in ways that are never to characterize a Christian. It's easy to excuse it when taking about or to a person with clearly wrong views, or a truly irking political personality. But as our goal in life as Christians is to win people to Christ, not to conservatism, God calls us to a higher level of conduct in the political realm.
Dec 8, 2007
Were We
Were We
Were we attacked, invaded, by enemy foreign
Alone in our cause, battered and torn
Would we wish others to join our cause?
Other nations to lend a hand with little pause?
Would we wish to be left alone,
Disregard and apathy by other nations shown?
Would we wish they keep to their selves
Not police the world, not in our nation’s affairs to delve?
If by mean cruelty and unlawful ends
A dictator took over, and our nation by force bends
If we had not the power to counter throw
Would we wish another to bring this tyrant low?
I feel we would wish to have friend
If desperate times of such should tend.
I do not think we wish another nation
To look the other way in such a situation.
Turn it around. What do you think?
Is a strict non-involvement policy a worthy brink?
If another nation found itself in such plight
Would such a policy lend us to do what is right?
The United States a policeman should not be
But a helper, defender, crusader She.
When the cause is just, the means cruel
Should we not enter into such duel?
A word of caution I urge
And mediation on this point encourage
Look down the line of history
And look forward in the mystery.
Think of how a policy of “we will let you alone”
Would change the world if evil over the earth was shown
Let our country’s interest for those who seek it ever be
Mercy, justice, and equity.
Were we attacked, invaded, by enemy foreign
Alone in our cause, battered and torn
Would we wish others to join our cause?
Other nations to lend a hand with little pause?
Would we wish to be left alone,
Disregard and apathy by other nations shown?
Would we wish they keep to their selves
Not police the world, not in our nation’s affairs to delve?
If by mean cruelty and unlawful ends
A dictator took over, and our nation by force bends
If we had not the power to counter throw
Would we wish another to bring this tyrant low?
I feel we would wish to have friend
If desperate times of such should tend.
I do not think we wish another nation
To look the other way in such a situation.
Turn it around. What do you think?
Is a strict non-involvement policy a worthy brink?
If another nation found itself in such plight
Would such a policy lend us to do what is right?
The United States a policeman should not be
But a helper, defender, crusader She.
When the cause is just, the means cruel
Should we not enter into such duel?
A word of caution I urge
And mediation on this point encourage
Look down the line of history
And look forward in the mystery.
Think of how a policy of “we will let you alone”
Would change the world if evil over the earth was shown
Let our country’s interest for those who seek it ever be
Mercy, justice, and equity.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Any thoughts? This poem, however poor in correct poetry form, brings up the point of looking at what a strict non-interventionist type policy would lead to if turned around. What would we think of it then?
Nov 24, 2007
Montana Politicians Endorse Paul
Ron Paul Gains Prominent Endorsements in Montana
November 13, 2007 6:59 pm EST
MISSOULA, MONTANA—Rising 2008 Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul was endorsed last week by the Montana Sports Shooting Association (MSSA), adding to his growing list of endorsements from Montana politicians.
"Ron Paul has been a consistent and ardent supporter of the rights of gun owners for 30 years,” said MSSA President Gary Marbut. “We commend him to all thoughtful and concerned gun owners."
The MSSA is a political action group that has successfully supported the Second Amendment rights of gun owners in Montana for the past twenty years, and has now thrown its support behind GOP presidential contender and Texas congressman Ron Paul. “Ron Paul has a long history of being four square in support of the right to keep and bear arms,” Mr. Marbut added.
Several Montana state legislators have recently endorsed Congressman Paul’s candidacy as well. State Senator (Senate District 3) Jerry O’Neil , State Representative (House District 12) Rick Jore, and State Representative (House District 70) Roger Koopman have come out in support of the 10-term Texas congressman.
Congressman Paul is the leading advocate for freedom in the nation’s capital. In his uncompromising support for the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights, he has never voted to restrict gun-owners’ Second Amendment rights, and has consistently fought to uphold American citizens’ civil liberties.
November 13, 2007 6:59 pm EST
MISSOULA, MONTANA—Rising 2008 Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul was endorsed last week by the Montana Sports Shooting Association (MSSA), adding to his growing list of endorsements from Montana politicians.
"Ron Paul has been a consistent and ardent supporter of the rights of gun owners for 30 years,” said MSSA President Gary Marbut. “We commend him to all thoughtful and concerned gun owners."
The MSSA is a political action group that has successfully supported the Second Amendment rights of gun owners in Montana for the past twenty years, and has now thrown its support behind GOP presidential contender and Texas congressman Ron Paul. “Ron Paul has a long history of being four square in support of the right to keep and bear arms,” Mr. Marbut added.
Several Montana state legislators have recently endorsed Congressman Paul’s candidacy as well. State Senator (Senate District 3) Jerry O’Neil , State Representative (House District 12) Rick Jore, and State Representative (House District 70) Roger Koopman have come out in support of the 10-term Texas congressman.
Congressman Paul is the leading advocate for freedom in the nation’s capital. In his uncompromising support for the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights, he has never voted to restrict gun-owners’ Second Amendment rights, and has consistently fought to uphold American citizens’ civil liberties.
Nov 16, 2007
Weddings Summer 2008
Well, here is a picture of my wonderful brother Scott, and his sweet fiancée, Kaleena. Scott announced his engagement in the early spring of this year for a wedding date of June, 2008. We were extremely excited for them and look forward to seeing them man and wife in just a few months. After dating for over a year, it will be extremely exciting for them to finally be married. =)Well, we though Scott would be the first of the siblings to get married, but....
Nov 9, 2007
Funny but true, quotes from an e-mail
Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress....But then I repeat myself. -Mark Twain
I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. -Winston Churchill
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
-George Bernard Shaw
A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man ....which debt he proposes to pay off with your money. -G. Gordon Liddy
Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.-James Bovard, Civil Libertarian (1994)
Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer of money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries. -Douglas Casey, Classmate of Bill Clinton at Georgetown University
Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. -P.J. O'Rourke, Civil Libertarian
Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.-Frederic Bastiat, French Economist (1801-1850)
Government's view of the econom y could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. - Ronald Regan, 1986
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. -Will Rogers
If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free! -P.J . O'Rourke
In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other. -Voltaire (1764)
Just b ecause you do not take an interest in politics doesn't mean politics won't take an interest in you! -Pericles (430 B.C.)
No man's life, libert y, or property is safe while the legislature is in session. -Mark Twain (1866)
Talk is cheap...except when Congress does it. -Unknown
The government is like a baby's alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other. -Ronald Reagan
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. -Winston Churchill
The only difference between a tax man and a taxidermist is that the taxidermist leaves the skin. -Mark Twain
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.-Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
What this country needs are more unemployed politicians. -Edward Langley, Artist (1928 - 1995)
A government big enough to give you everything you want is strong enough to take everything you have. -Thomas Jefferson
I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. -Winston Churchill
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
-George Bernard Shaw
A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man ....which debt he proposes to pay off with your money. -G. Gordon Liddy
Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.-James Bovard, Civil Libertarian (1994)
Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer of money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries. -Douglas Casey, Classmate of Bill Clinton at Georgetown University
Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. -P.J. O'Rourke, Civil Libertarian
Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.-Frederic Bastiat, French Economist (1801-1850)
Government's view of the econom y could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. - Ronald Regan, 1986
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. -Will Rogers
If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free! -P.J . O'Rourke
In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other. -Voltaire (1764)
Just b ecause you do not take an interest in politics doesn't mean politics won't take an interest in you! -Pericles (430 B.C.)
No man's life, libert y, or property is safe while the legislature is in session. -Mark Twain (1866)
Talk is cheap...except when Congress does it. -Unknown
The government is like a baby's alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other. -Ronald Reagan
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. -Winston Churchill
The only difference between a tax man and a taxidermist is that the taxidermist leaves the skin. -Mark Twain
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.-Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
What this country needs are more unemployed politicians. -Edward Langley, Artist (1928 - 1995)
A government big enough to give you everything you want is strong enough to take everything you have. -Thomas Jefferson
Oct 21, 2007
FYI: Spe Vivitur
Please notice the change to the 'blogs I visit' side bar. My sister Kristi has once again returned to her blog. I'm thinking that if we badger her with comments...she might keep it up a while. =)
Oct 19, 2007
Exegetical Report 2
Sorry if my reports for school are dull, but for right now, it's about all I can post...so bear with me. =)
Brooke T.
Greek III
10.22.07
Greek III
10.22.07
Teaching Report
Text: Ephesians 4:12 “…toward the complete furnishing of the saints, for the work of ministry, for the edification of the body of Christ…”
The words 'toward' and 'for' used in this context indicate a purpose or a reason why. Primarily here, the reason why Christ has given the gifts outlined in the prior verse. These reasons seem to be in somewhat of a progressive format. The first reasoning being that the Church may be fully prepared. Prepared for what? For the work of the ministry of the Church and for its edification. The end result being delineated in verse 13, “…until we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ…” Hence, although in the Church’s paramount purpose is Theocentric in its objective to bring glory to God, the principal intention in the giving of these gifts is ecclesia-centric. That is, for the Church’s edification, unity, and growth; this ultimately reflecting back to God’s glory. Consistent with the rest of the book, the reasoning for these gifts is not in the least an individual objective.
How does this fit with the context/further the argument of the author?
The central theme thus far in the book of Ephesians has been centered on the marvelous and mysterious work God has done to bring about the body of Christ. Throughout the book, Paul writing by the Spirit has been revealing what the Church truly is. It is an instrument by which God displays His awesome wisdom to the Heavens, a means to show forth His gospel to the world, and a body in which the individual parts are interdependent on one another. In this verse, Paul again reminds us that the gifts God gives to those individual parts have a greater purpose. There is something far more superior God is growing through us, namely, the Church.
How would I use this in a teaching session?
When God “measures out” as it were, His spiritual gifts, He has an expressed desire in doing so. As it has long been said, God did not grant the gift of preaching to someone so he could preach to himself in a closet. The purpose clause adjoining the list of gifts set forth in verse 11 is the working and edification of the Church so that it may grow into the complete man of verse 13. The weight of this theme in the book of Ephesians expels the notion of an individualistic Christian walk. Surely the personal relationship between the child of God and his Father is not to be set aside. But God has masterfully architected a magnificent edifice made up of each individual Christian lending its support with the particular gift given to him, unto the overarching purpose of being fit and built into a glorious temple reflecting and exhibiting the magnificence of God.
The words 'toward' and 'for' used in this context indicate a purpose or a reason why. Primarily here, the reason why Christ has given the gifts outlined in the prior verse. These reasons seem to be in somewhat of a progressive format. The first reasoning being that the Church may be fully prepared. Prepared for what? For the work of the ministry of the Church and for its edification. The end result being delineated in verse 13, “…until we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ…” Hence, although in the Church’s paramount purpose is Theocentric in its objective to bring glory to God, the principal intention in the giving of these gifts is ecclesia-centric. That is, for the Church’s edification, unity, and growth; this ultimately reflecting back to God’s glory. Consistent with the rest of the book, the reasoning for these gifts is not in the least an individual objective.
How does this fit with the context/further the argument of the author?
The central theme thus far in the book of Ephesians has been centered on the marvelous and mysterious work God has done to bring about the body of Christ. Throughout the book, Paul writing by the Spirit has been revealing what the Church truly is. It is an instrument by which God displays His awesome wisdom to the Heavens, a means to show forth His gospel to the world, and a body in which the individual parts are interdependent on one another. In this verse, Paul again reminds us that the gifts God gives to those individual parts have a greater purpose. There is something far more superior God is growing through us, namely, the Church.
How would I use this in a teaching session?
When God “measures out” as it were, His spiritual gifts, He has an expressed desire in doing so. As it has long been said, God did not grant the gift of preaching to someone so he could preach to himself in a closet. The purpose clause adjoining the list of gifts set forth in verse 11 is the working and edification of the Church so that it may grow into the complete man of verse 13. The weight of this theme in the book of Ephesians expels the notion of an individualistic Christian walk. Surely the personal relationship between the child of God and his Father is not to be set aside. But God has masterfully architected a magnificent edifice made up of each individual Christian lending its support with the particular gift given to him, unto the overarching purpose of being fit and built into a glorious temple reflecting and exhibiting the magnificence of God.
Oct 13, 2007
Where has time gone?
Life has accelerated to a greater speed than I feel comfortable driving with, but I guess I must learn how for it looks as if it will be at this speed for a while. While it is, my blog will be neglected more than it has been. But as life moves on I suppose this is a good thing. =) I hope you all are doing well!
Sep 27, 2007
Exegetical Report
Greek III
Brooke T.
9.26.07
Text:
Ephesians 2:19 “…so then no longer are you a stranger and alien, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God…”
Words like ‘but’ and ‘no longer’ signify a difference to what was previously, a negation of past comments or a past state of being. It does the same here, indicating, obviously, that this is how it is, but it wasn’t always this way.
Through the last chapter, Paul has been setting forth the facts of our dire state. In the immediate context of verse 19, this has been centered around our alienation to Israel – we weren’t any where in that picture - “…estranged from the commonwealth of Israel and strange to the covenant of the promises having no hope and without God in the world…” – could it state any clearer the mess we were in? Burst forth then the glorious words of vs. 13 “BUT GOD.” From that point until here, Paul explains how Jesus broke down the separation between Israel and we the godless Gentiles. We are no longer stranger, for Jesus through His amazing act of grace and love took us from our hopeless state, right into the very household of God.
For me personally, being very familiar with the Jesus’ saving work on the cross, it is extremely easy for me to forget what my position was like before the before the ‘no longer’. Hopeless, godless, alone, and alienated. God had no obligation to free us from that state. There was nothing special in the very least about us that should be particularly attractive to Him: after all, we were His enemies. But He took us to Himself just the same. That is the awesomeness of God’s love: not that He loved us because we were special but that He loved us because He chose to - for His glory and spectacular plan. May God help me never to cease remembering that He saved me from an impossible condition, and that I am in that condition no longer.
Brooke T.
9.26.07
Text:
Ephesians 2:19 “…so then no longer are you a stranger and alien, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God…”
Words like ‘but’ and ‘no longer’ signify a difference to what was previously, a negation of past comments or a past state of being. It does the same here, indicating, obviously, that this is how it is, but it wasn’t always this way.
Through the last chapter, Paul has been setting forth the facts of our dire state. In the immediate context of verse 19, this has been centered around our alienation to Israel – we weren’t any where in that picture - “…estranged from the commonwealth of Israel and strange to the covenant of the promises having no hope and without God in the world…” – could it state any clearer the mess we were in? Burst forth then the glorious words of vs. 13 “BUT GOD.” From that point until here, Paul explains how Jesus broke down the separation between Israel and we the godless Gentiles. We are no longer stranger, for Jesus through His amazing act of grace and love took us from our hopeless state, right into the very household of God.
For me personally, being very familiar with the Jesus’ saving work on the cross, it is extremely easy for me to forget what my position was like before the before the ‘no longer’. Hopeless, godless, alone, and alienated. God had no obligation to free us from that state. There was nothing special in the very least about us that should be particularly attractive to Him: after all, we were His enemies. But He took us to Himself just the same. That is the awesomeness of God’s love: not that He loved us because we were special but that He loved us because He chose to - for His glory and spectacular plan. May God help me never to cease remembering that He saved me from an impossible condition, and that I am in that condition no longer.
Sep 13, 2007
Lafayette, Hero of the American Revolution
"Born of wealthy aristocracy in France, Lafayette seemed like an unlikely candidate for honor in a republican revolution. Lafayette's father, a soldier, died in battle when his son was only tow. Young Lafayette read widely, especially military books, and he too became an officer in the French army. When he was eighteen, Lafayette attended a dinner where the American War for Independence was discussed . For some reason the American cause fired his imagination. When an American Representative came to France in 1776 seeking officers for the Continental army, Lafayette enthusiastically volunteered...When General Washington learned of that he was receiving a nineteen-year-old major general in his command, he was cool to the idea. On meeting the young officer, however, Washington's doubts melted. Lafayette was gracious, humble, and eager bother to learn and to serve. A strong affection grew between the American commander and the young French nobleman. For Washington Lafayette became the son he had never had. For Lafayette, Washington became the father he had never known. Lafayette served bravely with the Continental army. On his education as a soldier he wrote, "I read, I study, I examine, I listen, I think, and out of all that I try to form an idea into which I put as much common sense as I can." Despite his studious nature, Lafayette was no armchair soldier; he was always in the thick of the fighting. He was wounded at the Battle of Brandywine, and a small force under his command constantly harassed Cornwallis and the British in Virginia. At Yorktown, he led an attack on a major British fortification. When he returned to France after the war, Lafayette left behind him a large group of veterans who had been impressed with the young man's unflagging cheerfulness and unquestioned courage."
Excerpt from "United States History" BJU press.
Excerpt from "United States History" BJU press.
Aug 27, 2007
Prayer Alert from the Slavic Gospel Association
This is a letter that I received regarding a pastor in Azerbaijan. As stated later in the letter, the iron curtain to the Gospel is falling once again. We all rejoice for the time that the countries in the former Soviet Union were free to preach and hear the Gospel. But after only about decade, that door is slowly closing again. It's a comforting thought that God does indeed control the affairs of this world and this is no surprise to Him. And yet, although God controls all, He still commands that we pray, and so we should that the door would stay open in the former USSR. The freedom that we experience here to worship God, learn more about Him, and preach His word, is one that is relatively new-found to those living in the former USSR. And one that already is gone to some of the countries therein. This freedom is pivotal to get the word out to the spiritually starved people across Russia and the surrounding countries. Certainly, not all of those countries in the former Soviet Union are closed or closing, but the situation is precarious as this letter reveals.
Azerbaijan Pastor Imprisoned
Dear Precious Partners in the Gospel,
Greetings in the matchless name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. A serious matter has arisen calling for urgent prayer, and I wanted to take this opportunity to make you aware of it.
Evangelical church leaders in the former Soviet republic of Azerbaijan are asking for urgent prayer in connection with the case of 44-year-old Rev. Zaur Balaev, a Baptist pastor in the village of Aliabad, in Azerbaijan’s far north. An Azeri court has sentenced Pastor Balaev to two years in prison without possibility of parole after his conviction on what church leaders say are trumped up, false charges.
On May 20, 2007, police raided Pastor Balaev’s church during a worship service and ordered a halt to the proceedings. The congregants left as ordered, but two hours later, the police returned and arrested Pastor Balaev. They charged the frail Balaev with beating up five policemen, damaging a police car, and conducting illegal meetings without state registration. According to the leaders of the Azerbaijan Union of Evangelical Christians-Baptists and witnesses at the scene, these accusations are totally false.
Our UECB brothers tell us that village authorities in Aliabad had made several attempts to close the church on the pretext that the church is not registered. However, it is almost impossible to register a church in Azerbaijan, even though the Aliabad congregation belongs to the national UECB.
There are also deep concerns over Pastor Balaev’s health. He has problems with his heart and kidneys, which could well be exacerbated by the harsh conditions in Azeri prisons. As have other believers, this faithful brother is having to endure oppressive heat in prison, along with the cruel taunts and other possible abuse of the prison guards. UECB leaders are asking believers worldwide to pray for Zaur Balaev and are pledging to do everything in their power to seek his release. They have launched appeals to a higher court. Next, if necessary, they plan to appeal to the Azerbaijan Supreme Court and will follow up as needed with an appeal to the European Court of Justice. Pending these appeals, Pastor Balaev is being held in a detention center and will be remanded to prison if his appeals are not successful. Meanwhile, the church continues, being led by a deacon, and meeting in the Balaev home.
This is yet another example of how oppression of believers is increasing and doors are closing for ministry in many areas of the former Soviet Union.
Pastor Balaev has a wife named Selminaz and two children, 20-year-old Grigory and 17-year-old Natia. Zaur’s imprisonment will mean great hardship for the family, as he raised produce in the fields to support them. Their church members are mostly made up of retirees, with only eight people employed and even that providing only limited income. The Balaevs need a minimum of $200 a month to make ends meet.
Please join us in prayer over this tragic situation. And as always, please know how much I appreciate your faithful partnership your support and the prayers you are already offering up on behalf of our ministry.
For our Savior,
Bob Provost President, Slavic Gospel Association
Aug 23, 2007
More Thoughts on Israel...
Israel: a little, tiny, Jewish country amid the vast Muslim world. How could this little piece of land, occupied by relatively few, be the cause of headline after headline and constant Middle East strife? There may be multiple reasons, but one is quite clear: Israel is Jewish and the Middle East is Muslim. Israel promises freedom of worship, and accepts Western influence. The majority of the rest of the Middle East does not. Quite literally it is "become a Muslim or suffer" for most of the Middle East. This is one reason why I for one support our country's strong ties with Israel. A country that as general rule promotes freedom and liberty, especially one in the Middle East, is one that should be supported. As a general rule, that is. Certainly not a blind support, in the occasion that she should make a wrong decision. Another reason for this sentiment, is the ties that God has with Israel. Although (as stated previously in another post) God has temporarily put Israel aside because of her hard heart, He will return to her. And when He does I would like to be on Israel's 'good side', as it were. Although, it isn't as though countries will really matter by that time. For when that time comes, it will only matter if one part of God's kingdom, not what kingdom anyone belonged to down here. But it remains a good thought to be have been an ally to the country God will restore.
God says to Abraham in Gen. 12.2-3 "I will make you a great nation;I will bless you and make your name great; And you shall be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, And I will curse him who curses you; And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”
Now, as to whether or not Genesis 12 applies to today is a bit of a question since Israel is being set aside at the moment. If it does apply to today, then there would be every reason to support Israel, after all "I will bless those who bless you". If it does not apply, well, there seems to be little harm in backing a country with such historic importance in our faith, and in the plan of redemption. To me this is rather an important issue. With friends going to and from Israel fairly often I would like to think of the country that they are going to as a friend and not a foe of the United States. I would also enjoy the comfort of knowing that we would support Israel with military power if need be should she come under fire. I don't know where military action would land constitutionally, (if someone does, I would love to learn) but in this case I believe that for the various reasons stated, it would not be an altogether unwise decision if it should come to that. But I hope that long before that would ever be necessary that God's people, the Church, would give the call to arms in prayer. To pray for the peace of Jerusalem, and for the hearts of those who live in her as she struggles in the midst of a land filled with war.
God says to Abraham in Gen. 12.2-3 "I will make you a great nation;I will bless you and make your name great; And you shall be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, And I will curse him who curses you; And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”
Now, as to whether or not Genesis 12 applies to today is a bit of a question since Israel is being set aside at the moment. If it does apply to today, then there would be every reason to support Israel, after all "I will bless those who bless you". If it does not apply, well, there seems to be little harm in backing a country with such historic importance in our faith, and in the plan of redemption. To me this is rather an important issue. With friends going to and from Israel fairly often I would like to think of the country that they are going to as a friend and not a foe of the United States. I would also enjoy the comfort of knowing that we would support Israel with military power if need be should she come under fire. I don't know where military action would land constitutionally, (if someone does, I would love to learn) but in this case I believe that for the various reasons stated, it would not be an altogether unwise decision if it should come to that. But I hope that long before that would ever be necessary that God's people, the Church, would give the call to arms in prayer. To pray for the peace of Jerusalem, and for the hearts of those who live in her as she struggles in the midst of a land filled with war.
******************************************
Aug 4, 2007
How do they score?
Below I have listed the candidates that are running for the republican ticket. Beside each issue I have put my personal rating. 10 being great and 1 being very poor. I welcome all comments as to the precision of my remarks or any other comments for that matter. =)
Sam Brownback (Kansas Senator) (7)
-Iraq: he sees the need in Iraq to give the government over to the citizens, but he didn't specify how. He has not, however, given up hope on the situation there although he does see the precariousness of the situation there. (6)
-Policy regarding Israel: he thinks we should stand by her, I agree. (10)
-Life: emphatically pro-life. (10)
-Marriage: Emphatically pro-traditional marriage. (10)
-Border security: raises border security as it is now, and looks to cut down the amount of illegal workers in our country (7)
-Taxes: looking for lower, simpler/reformed taxes. (8)
-Family/ liberty: for the family (hence, anti- pornography etc.). And although he sees that it is the parent’s duty to shelter their kids from foul content, he is for stricter restrictions on the media that chooses to broadcast obscene or violent material. (9)
Caution: maybe a little too much like a politician.
Rudy Giuliani (Former mayor of New York City) (5)
Iraq/ terror: Giuliani is for an aggressive face toward terrorism. He is intent on wining this war against terror, which he believes was thrust upon us by the terrorists (I agree). In Iraq, he is against a timetable for withdrawal and is aware that failure in Iraq would have broad and deep side effects. (8)
2. Gun rights: a definite right for the American people. (7)
3. Life: personally may not be for abortion, and has voted for a ban on partial birth abortion, but is allowing for it to be the choice of the mother. (0)
4. Marriage: believes that marriage should be between a man and a women, but did not seem emphatic on this point. (6)
5. Border Security: not available on his site.
6. Taxes: he is for fiscal responsibility, and claims, like all other candidates, that he has cut taxes. (7)
7. Family/ liberty: again, fairly silent on his site, save that he believes in the preservation of the rights granted in the constitution. (6)
Mike Huckabee, former Governor of Arkansas (9)
-Iraq/ terror: Also against a timetable, and strongly believes that withdrawal would be disastrous for the Iraqis. Believes in continuing to fight the war on terror, but not always resorting to war, using diplomacy as well. (7)
-Israel: staunch supporter of Israel. (10)
-Gun rights: Very much for it. (10)
-Life: no shadow of a doubt, pro-life to the core. (10)
-Marriage: for traditional marriage to the core. (10)
-Border security: he is for increasing our border security, and for being firm with the illegal immigrants already here. (9)
-Taxes: for cutting over spending, and, as always, he claims to have reduced taxation. (8)
-Family/ liberty: As for the family, Huckabee is emphatic that our country was founded on faith. For him personally, he sees no distinction between his faith and his life. His faith is his life. (10)
John McCain (Senator from Arizona) (7)
-Life: McCain is indeed pro-life. He is dogmatic that the courts should not legislate in this matter or any others, but he believes in returning this issue to the state by overturning Roe v. Wade and then letting the states themselves decide. McCain does realize the importance of winning this war for life in the hearts and minds of people, and that government action on this is a long way from defeating abortion. (8)
-Marriage: Once again, no legislating from the bench...a state issue. But he is pro-traditional marriage. (8)
-Iraq: "We cannot fail." - says he. Not only would failure be bad for the Iraqi's, but also for our future safety. He realizes that Americans need to know the truth for why we are there. He is long-sighted and sees the consequences of defeat. He does have a plan, and is listening to good advice on the subject. (9)
-Border Security: sees the need to strengthen our borders and being tough on the illegal immigrants already here. (7)
-Taxes: desires to use common sense, restraint, and accountability in spending. (8)
-Family/ liberty: Gun rights are essential rights to McCain, and he has actively supported legislation that would secure the bad influence on the internet from children etc. (7)
When talking about his faith, McCain was horribly politically correct and did not specify which "higher power" he referred to. He claims, however, that his life is based on the fact that there is a God and he strives to live in honorably and ethically. (6)
Ron Paul (U.S. Representative from Texas ) (7)
1. Iraq: Believes that the war in Iraq was based on wrong information and although I did not see a plan for what to do now, it generally seems that he is against it in all aspects. (3)
2. Foreign policy: Believe that we should not meddle in other countries affairs. This is a great thing, the only concern I might have would be that there might arise a situation that poses no harm to us, but is evil and must be stopped (i.e. present conditions in Sudan.). Otherwise I see this as a great thing. (8)
3. Life: no question here; pro-life all the way. (11)
4. Taxes/debt: Low taxation creates a better America, says he, and so we all agree. In addition he sees a definite need to do something about our debt.(10)
5. Marriage/family: didn't see anything about this on his sight, but from other sources it appears that he would not oppose gay rights on a federal level but leave it to the states. I'm not even sure if he would oppose it on a personal level... (5)
6. Freedom: Ron Paul is THE most constitutional/ small government minded candidate there is currently running. (10)
Mitt Romney (former Governor of Massachusetts) (6)
-Iraq/ terror: Believes we must fight Jihad, and that we can do it by promoting peace and to support modern Muslim nations. (3)
-Taxes: keep taxes low, and simplify them. Sees the need to curve spending and borrowing. (7)
-Border Security: He is for immigration, but is intent on attracting immigration legally by making is easier to come in legally. (7)
-Life/marriage: He does see the need to protect life and family values, not especially dogmatic on this point, or at least it seems that way to me. (7)
-Education: sees a need to raise the standard of our failing educational system. (8)
Mike Huckabee is #1 in my mind; his strong faith in the One True God and his frankness about it is a top-ranking issue with me. Ron Paul is a somewhat close second. His desire to stick to the Constitution and his staunch small-government position is most appealing. His views on Iraq, however, I'm afraid I quite disagree with.
Sam Brownback (Kansas Senator) (7)
-Iraq: he sees the need in Iraq to give the government over to the citizens, but he didn't specify how. He has not, however, given up hope on the situation there although he does see the precariousness of the situation there. (6)
-Policy regarding Israel: he thinks we should stand by her, I agree. (10)
-Life: emphatically pro-life. (10)
-Marriage: Emphatically pro-traditional marriage. (10)
-Border security: raises border security as it is now, and looks to cut down the amount of illegal workers in our country (7)
-Taxes: looking for lower, simpler/reformed taxes. (8)
-Family/ liberty: for the family (hence, anti- pornography etc.). And although he sees that it is the parent’s duty to shelter their kids from foul content, he is for stricter restrictions on the media that chooses to broadcast obscene or violent material. (9)
Caution: maybe a little too much like a politician.
Rudy Giuliani (Former mayor of New York City) (5)
Iraq/ terror: Giuliani is for an aggressive face toward terrorism. He is intent on wining this war against terror, which he believes was thrust upon us by the terrorists (I agree). In Iraq, he is against a timetable for withdrawal and is aware that failure in Iraq would have broad and deep side effects. (8)
2. Gun rights: a definite right for the American people. (7)
3. Life: personally may not be for abortion, and has voted for a ban on partial birth abortion, but is allowing for it to be the choice of the mother. (0)
4. Marriage: believes that marriage should be between a man and a women, but did not seem emphatic on this point. (6)
5. Border Security: not available on his site.
6. Taxes: he is for fiscal responsibility, and claims, like all other candidates, that he has cut taxes. (7)
7. Family/ liberty: again, fairly silent on his site, save that he believes in the preservation of the rights granted in the constitution. (6)
Mike Huckabee, former Governor of Arkansas (9)
-Iraq/ terror: Also against a timetable, and strongly believes that withdrawal would be disastrous for the Iraqis. Believes in continuing to fight the war on terror, but not always resorting to war, using diplomacy as well. (7)
-Israel: staunch supporter of Israel. (10)
-Gun rights: Very much for it. (10)
-Life: no shadow of a doubt, pro-life to the core. (10)
-Marriage: for traditional marriage to the core. (10)
-Border security: he is for increasing our border security, and for being firm with the illegal immigrants already here. (9)
-Taxes: for cutting over spending, and, as always, he claims to have reduced taxation. (8)
-Family/ liberty: As for the family, Huckabee is emphatic that our country was founded on faith. For him personally, he sees no distinction between his faith and his life. His faith is his life. (10)
John McCain (Senator from Arizona) (7)
-Life: McCain is indeed pro-life. He is dogmatic that the courts should not legislate in this matter or any others, but he believes in returning this issue to the state by overturning Roe v. Wade and then letting the states themselves decide. McCain does realize the importance of winning this war for life in the hearts and minds of people, and that government action on this is a long way from defeating abortion. (8)
-Marriage: Once again, no legislating from the bench...a state issue. But he is pro-traditional marriage. (8)
-Iraq: "We cannot fail." - says he. Not only would failure be bad for the Iraqi's, but also for our future safety. He realizes that Americans need to know the truth for why we are there. He is long-sighted and sees the consequences of defeat. He does have a plan, and is listening to good advice on the subject. (9)
-Border Security: sees the need to strengthen our borders and being tough on the illegal immigrants already here. (7)
-Taxes: desires to use common sense, restraint, and accountability in spending. (8)
-Family/ liberty: Gun rights are essential rights to McCain, and he has actively supported legislation that would secure the bad influence on the internet from children etc. (7)
When talking about his faith, McCain was horribly politically correct and did not specify which "higher power" he referred to. He claims, however, that his life is based on the fact that there is a God and he strives to live in honorably and ethically. (6)
Ron Paul (U.S. Representative from Texas ) (7)
1. Iraq: Believes that the war in Iraq was based on wrong information and although I did not see a plan for what to do now, it generally seems that he is against it in all aspects. (3)
2. Foreign policy: Believe that we should not meddle in other countries affairs. This is a great thing, the only concern I might have would be that there might arise a situation that poses no harm to us, but is evil and must be stopped (i.e. present conditions in Sudan.). Otherwise I see this as a great thing. (8)
3. Life: no question here; pro-life all the way. (11)
4. Taxes/debt: Low taxation creates a better America, says he, and so we all agree. In addition he sees a definite need to do something about our debt.(10)
5. Marriage/family: didn't see anything about this on his sight, but from other sources it appears that he would not oppose gay rights on a federal level but leave it to the states. I'm not even sure if he would oppose it on a personal level... (5)
6. Freedom: Ron Paul is THE most constitutional/ small government minded candidate there is currently running. (10)
Mitt Romney (former Governor of Massachusetts) (6)
-Iraq/ terror: Believes we must fight Jihad, and that we can do it by promoting peace and to support modern Muslim nations. (3)
-Taxes: keep taxes low, and simplify them. Sees the need to curve spending and borrowing. (7)
-Border Security: He is for immigration, but is intent on attracting immigration legally by making is easier to come in legally. (7)
-Life/marriage: He does see the need to protect life and family values, not especially dogmatic on this point, or at least it seems that way to me. (7)
-Education: sees a need to raise the standard of our failing educational system. (8)
Mike Huckabee is #1 in my mind; his strong faith in the One True God and his frankness about it is a top-ranking issue with me. Ron Paul is a somewhat close second. His desire to stick to the Constitution and his staunch small-government position is most appealing. His views on Iraq, however, I'm afraid I quite disagree with.
Jul 23, 2007
BBC Article
This article from BBC's website dated May 17, 2007 was an enjoyable read for me. I have yet to find an American article so supportive and encouraging about our own troops as this one from BBC. Mind, that doesn't mean that they're not out there, nor that the U.S. military is not without its many faults, but nevertheless it made me happy to read it, and I hope it will encourage some of my readers as well.
'Can-do' spirit of US troops in Baghdad
By Mark Urban BBC News, Baghdad
News night report As the search for three US soldiers abducted south of Baghdad continues, our correspondent - who spent three days embedded with US troops - says their comrades remain remarkably positive despite the dangers.
Down in the heart of Dura market there is an old cafe where American soldiers eat, smoke and chat. It is a tiny space with five plastic tables, tiled walls and a sink that sometimes has running water. It provides a social centre to the outpost where soldiers are trying to secure this part of Baghdad. The first phase - blocking off the market so the stall holders could work in safety - was achieved earlier this year. But the second, trying to extend that success to the neighbouring blocks, has brought tough opposition.
Creative thinking
Sitting in the cafe late at night, we talked over the fight for Dura. US troops are trying to secure Baghdad. My BBC colleague, Mark McCauley, instructed Lieutenant Jake Carlisle in the art of rolling your own cigarettes. He also told him how it had felt, as a young Catholic from Londonderry in Northern Ireland, having British troops on the streets of his city.
And I shared experiences from my time with Russian troops in Afghanistan.
All the time Lieutenant Carlisle and his platoon sergeant, Dorian Perez, drank up the experience and compared it with their own. I had always thought of the US army as an organisation that did not exactly ban creative thinking, but severely limited it at lower levels.
And there were Lieutenant Carlisle and Sergeant Perez wondering how important waving and smiling were in Arab culture or considering the value of removing your sunglasses when speaking to Iraqis.
Sense of responsibility
Their platoon numbers 37, of whom two have been killed and several wounded since their operations started in Dura. US troops operate in some of Iraq's most dangerous areas. Shot at one hour and smiling at the locals the next, it would be the easiest thing in the world to get spiteful, Sergeant Perez told me, but it would also be totally self-defeating. The sergeant is 34 and he has been in the army for nearly half of his life. I wondered how Iraq did not exhaust the positive energy or intellectual curiosity of a man like Dorian Perez. You can marvel at the Americans' can-do spirit, as some British soldiers do. You can see it in terms of America, the world's hyper power staring failure in the face and refusing to accept it. But in the sergeant's case the will to carry on comes from a sense of responsibility towards the people of Iraq.
Sergeant Perez buys the so-called pottery shop analogy that seems singularly appropriate to the Dura market: if you break it, you own it.
The right balance
Lieutenant Carlisle is a 26-year-old from Wisconsin. He is a tall, lanky presence even in his body armour, loping down the dusty streets propelled by a young officer's enthusiasm or desire to do it right in front of his superiors, and, of course, us. When I ask him whether they were right to storm one house, frightening the inhabitants, he does his best to back his men while conceding they probably should have done it differently. In the end, he always has to explain the abrasive features of his patrolling in terms of the high threat they face from roadside bombs, snipers and the like. And that balance between self-protection and alienating the local people is at the heart of many a late-night conversation in the cafe.
The British army
From the odd glimpse or overheard remark, I do not doubt that the second platoon contains the odd bad apple or loud-mouth, but as my time with them went on I became aware of an uncomfortable feeling. When eventually I was able to identify it, I realised my unease concerned British soldiers, and how they compared with these Americans. Carlisle, Perez and the rest seem brighter, stronger and more committed. The British army still has many outstanding qualities but it has had great difficulty recruiting for the past decade. Many recruits who would once have been thrown out have been pushed through the training establishments.
In many British infantry battalions 15% or 20% are now Fijians or other Commonwealth contract soldiers. The Americans, by contrast, may have had some recent problems staffing their army but they have been able to retain more of a sense of common purpose and drive.
American determination
If they are that good, you might ask, why are they not getting better results in Baghdad? There is history, of course, of terrible past mistakes. There are numbers: Baghdad is a city of six million. There is also ruthless intimidation by al-Qaeda of local people and the simple prejudice of those who will never like the Americans because they are unbelievers. But there is no shortage of determination or creativity and tonight Sergeant Perez and Lieutenant Carlisle will probably resume their running discourse in the Dura cafe about how they can do it better tomorrow.
By Mark Urban BBC News, Baghdad
News night report As the search for three US soldiers abducted south of Baghdad continues, our correspondent - who spent three days embedded with US troops - says their comrades remain remarkably positive despite the dangers.
Down in the heart of Dura market there is an old cafe where American soldiers eat, smoke and chat. It is a tiny space with five plastic tables, tiled walls and a sink that sometimes has running water. It provides a social centre to the outpost where soldiers are trying to secure this part of Baghdad. The first phase - blocking off the market so the stall holders could work in safety - was achieved earlier this year. But the second, trying to extend that success to the neighbouring blocks, has brought tough opposition.
Creative thinking
Sitting in the cafe late at night, we talked over the fight for Dura. US troops are trying to secure Baghdad. My BBC colleague, Mark McCauley, instructed Lieutenant Jake Carlisle in the art of rolling your own cigarettes. He also told him how it had felt, as a young Catholic from Londonderry in Northern Ireland, having British troops on the streets of his city.
And I shared experiences from my time with Russian troops in Afghanistan.
All the time Lieutenant Carlisle and his platoon sergeant, Dorian Perez, drank up the experience and compared it with their own. I had always thought of the US army as an organisation that did not exactly ban creative thinking, but severely limited it at lower levels.
And there were Lieutenant Carlisle and Sergeant Perez wondering how important waving and smiling were in Arab culture or considering the value of removing your sunglasses when speaking to Iraqis.
Sense of responsibility
Their platoon numbers 37, of whom two have been killed and several wounded since their operations started in Dura. US troops operate in some of Iraq's most dangerous areas. Shot at one hour and smiling at the locals the next, it would be the easiest thing in the world to get spiteful, Sergeant Perez told me, but it would also be totally self-defeating. The sergeant is 34 and he has been in the army for nearly half of his life. I wondered how Iraq did not exhaust the positive energy or intellectual curiosity of a man like Dorian Perez. You can marvel at the Americans' can-do spirit, as some British soldiers do. You can see it in terms of America, the world's hyper power staring failure in the face and refusing to accept it. But in the sergeant's case the will to carry on comes from a sense of responsibility towards the people of Iraq.
Sergeant Perez buys the so-called pottery shop analogy that seems singularly appropriate to the Dura market: if you break it, you own it.
The right balance
Lieutenant Carlisle is a 26-year-old from Wisconsin. He is a tall, lanky presence even in his body armour, loping down the dusty streets propelled by a young officer's enthusiasm or desire to do it right in front of his superiors, and, of course, us. When I ask him whether they were right to storm one house, frightening the inhabitants, he does his best to back his men while conceding they probably should have done it differently. In the end, he always has to explain the abrasive features of his patrolling in terms of the high threat they face from roadside bombs, snipers and the like. And that balance between self-protection and alienating the local people is at the heart of many a late-night conversation in the cafe.
The British army
From the odd glimpse or overheard remark, I do not doubt that the second platoon contains the odd bad apple or loud-mouth, but as my time with them went on I became aware of an uncomfortable feeling. When eventually I was able to identify it, I realised my unease concerned British soldiers, and how they compared with these Americans. Carlisle, Perez and the rest seem brighter, stronger and more committed. The British army still has many outstanding qualities but it has had great difficulty recruiting for the past decade. Many recruits who would once have been thrown out have been pushed through the training establishments.
In many British infantry battalions 15% or 20% are now Fijians or other Commonwealth contract soldiers. The Americans, by contrast, may have had some recent problems staffing their army but they have been able to retain more of a sense of common purpose and drive.
American determination
If they are that good, you might ask, why are they not getting better results in Baghdad? There is history, of course, of terrible past mistakes. There are numbers: Baghdad is a city of six million. There is also ruthless intimidation by al-Qaeda of local people and the simple prejudice of those who will never like the Americans because they are unbelievers. But there is no shortage of determination or creativity and tonight Sergeant Perez and Lieutenant Carlisle will probably resume their running discourse in the Dura cafe about how they can do it better tomorrow.
Jul 9, 2007
My Favorite Scripture Passage
Philippians 3:8-14
8 Yet indeed I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as rubbish, that I may gain Christ 9 and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith; 10 that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death, 11 if, by any means, I may attain to the resurrection from the dead.
12 Not that I have already attained, or am already perfected; but I press on, that I may lay hold of that for which Christ Jesus has also laid hold of me. 13 Brethren, I do not count myself to have apprehended; but one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind and reaching forward to those things which are ahead, 14 I press toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.
8 Yet indeed I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as rubbish, that I may gain Christ 9 and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith; 10 that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death, 11 if, by any means, I may attain to the resurrection from the dead.
12 Not that I have already attained, or am already perfected; but I press on, that I may lay hold of that for which Christ Jesus has also laid hold of me. 13 Brethren, I do not count myself to have apprehended; but one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind and reaching forward to those things which are ahead, 14 I press toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
